ATHEISM EXPOSED……

Let's be reasonable… Let's say, "We cannot prove or disprove there is a God." Let's both be agnostic here and ask yourself this question…

What is better?

Option A.) Live your entire life believing in science, doing what you want to do. No basis for morality. There is no God, you die and that's it.

But what if there is a God… Here is the God theory…

Option B.) Live your entire life believing in science, doing what you want to do. No basis for morality. There is a God, and you get dragged to Hell by demons because your soul is not pure enough to be in Heaven.

Is it worth taking a chance, believing in Option A.) IF Option B.) MIGHT be true? Is it worth spending 60-80 years on average doing what you want, but then spending an eternity being tortured in Hell? I think it's best to take the safe-side and believe in Jesus Christ. If He's not real you got no soul to lose, if He is real… You made stupid choice by not accepting Him as Lord and Savior. This Philosophy is called Pascal's Wager, by the way that states... That humans all bet with their lives either that God exists or not. Given the possibility that God actually does exist and assuming an infinite gain or loss associated with belief or unbelief in said God (as represented by an eternity in heaven or hell), a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss (some pleasures, luxury, etc.)

Atheists put their faith in Science; evolution which all can be disproven if you look into it. Look into Creation Science if you're so open-minded, think critically and do your research before you decide and have so much confidence in what is real and what is not real. Your Religion is Evolution and you are indoctrinated in it.

1 Samuel 2:3 - "Talk no more so very proudly, let not arrogance come from your mouth; for the Lord is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed"

God can be proven though, by many testimonies of many people, science can even prove God if you look for the proof. Kent Hovind, a former High School science teacher for 16 years, his Creation seminars are wonderful and can disprove science theories today and prove there is a God along with many other Christians. I recommend doing your research… It will save your soul.

Hosea 4:6 - "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge; because you have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being a priest to me. And since you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children."

Let's look at the proof now... Starting from the Beginning...

Genesis 1:1 - "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."

Now let's get a grasp on who God is... God is Spirit, a Holy Spirit, completely righteous and positive. John 4:24. God is love. 1 John 4:8. Now what is love... An emotion... Energy... A spirit is made up of energy, our emotion, our consciousness. You can look into this concept of energy within Science, Quantum Physics by people such as Albert Einstein, Dr. Emoto and Dr. Robert Lanza.

There is a principle in Science, Physics to be specific called, Conservation of Energy... Stating that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant irrespective of whatever internal changes may take place with energy disappearing in one form reappearing in another... In short, energy cannot be created or destroyed. Let's compare now...

Hebrews 7:3 - "Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually."

So God is a conscious spirit, a spirit is energy and energy has no end. That's Conservation of Energy, but this Scientific Principle wasn't discovered until 1853... Hebrews was written in 64AD... Hmmmm... Well, God obviously knows who He is and He cannot be mocked. Galatians 6:7.

So in the beginning God created the Earth... Plants, animals, humans... Let's compare to what Science says how the Earth was created... The Big Bang Theory...

A fireball of radiation at very high temperature and density, but occupying a tiny volume, is believed to have formed around 13.7 billion years ago. This expanded and cooled, extremely fast at first, but more slowly as subatomic particles condensed into matter that later accumulated to form galaxies and stars. The galaxies are still currently retreating from one another. What was left of the original radiation continued to cool and has been detected as a uniform background of weak microwave radiation.

Now to debunk this theory... Just from a Scientific perspective, not even bringing God into the picture... Let's just look at this theory from a complete Scientific secular standpoint...

Problem #1... Since when has creation come out of destruction? It also violates the first law of thermodynamics, which says you can't create or destroy matter or energy. Critics claim that the big bang theory suggests the universe began out of nothing. Proponents of the big bang theory say that such criticism is unwarranted for two reasons. The first is that the big bang doesn't address the creation of the universe, but rather the evolution of it. The other reason is that since the laws of science break down as you approach the creation of the universe, there's no reason to believe the first law of thermodynamics would apply.

Problem #2... The rotation of the planets... Some planets are rotating clockwise some are rotating counter-clockwise... Every planet in our solar system except for Venus and Uranus rotates counter-clockwise. But if the Big Bang was true and that this fireball is rotating in one direction accumulating matter... then bang... the matter and planets/stars came flying off of this fireball... We'd have all the stars and planets rotating in the same direction... All clockwise or counterclockwise. This Scientific Principle is called, Angular Momentum.

Problem #3... Some critics say that the formation of stars and galaxies violates the law of entropy, which suggests systems of change become less organized over time. But if you view the early universe as completely homogeneous and isotropic, then the current universe shows signs of obeying the law of entropy.

So if we have proven Big Bang wrong, that it is not Scientific, then we could just stop right here and not even have to move onto debunk Theory of Evolution... Because if Big Bang didn't happen and no Earth came out of the Big Bang then there is no Earth and if there is no Earth there is no animal or human life to be able to evolve... But we know there is Earth and there is animal and human life... So let's go ahead and debunk evolution anyway...

Before I get ahead of myself, a little History lesson...

In 1859, Charles Darwin wrote in his book, Origin of the Species, "Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?" This is from Chapter 6, entitled Difficulties on the Theory. Even Darwin himself questioned his own theory... Within his book he is always using terms such as, "maybe," "probably," and "could be," showing that he seen the flaws within his own theory. Scientists who believe Evolution have been searching for transitional forms ever since... To go as far as to forging fossils to prove the theory. I'm debunking Atheism last, because I notice majority of Atheist come about because of lies of religion... The failed mainline churches who are teaching false doctrine fail in teaching their congregation... Lack of knowledge. Hosea 4:6. These churches, Catholicism, Evangelical, Calvinism, Pentecostal, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witness, etc. If false doctrine is being taught and the Pastor cannot answer opposing questions... Faith is lost... Jesus told us of this. Luke 6:46-49. Matthew 15:14.

Now before I get to debunking the fraudulent fossil record... I would like to start with Ernst Haeckel's drawings of Evolution of Embryos. The saddest thing is that these drawings are still printed in some of todays school science text books with full knowledge that they are wrong for nearly the last 100 years; why are we teaching outdated material to our youth to only blindly accept something false as fact. Whatever the School System teaches to a child, they will accept it as fact with no question. This is wrong.

The Haeckel embryo sequence shown purported to show, left to right... a hog, calf, rabbit and human embryo. This has long been said to demonstrate that humans share a common ancestry with these animals and thus proving the Theory of Evolution. If you take a minute and go and compare these embryos, you will see a difference and be able to identify them by their differences.

The dog embryo and human embryo, shown in Haeckel's book and even some textbooks today are completely identical. Haeckel maintained that he faithfully copied the dog embryo from Bischoff 4th Week. A professor named, L. Rutimeyer then reprinted the original picture of the embryos at 4 Weeks, and Haeckel's drawings of the embryos at 4 Weeks. The originals were very much different.

L. Rutimeyer, was a professor of zoology and comparative anatomy at the University of Basel. There was an article debunking these drawings of Haeckel's by Rutimeyer in 1868 titled, "Referate," in Archiv fur Anthropologie, Pages 301-302. This is why peer review is important, but... The Scientific Community today, emotionally clingy to the beloved Theory of Evolution... They don't want it to be proven true, so they teach ignorance to the youth to blindly accept. You could consider this propaganda. There needs to be honest peer review in the Scientific Community, in the name of Science which is supposed to be defined by study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments and observation. Obviously not observing here, since these frauds are still being taught... At Jena University where Haeckel taught, he was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a university court. We need to take fraud seriously.

And there is peer review, a more recent one as well, but it is deliberately IGNORED by the Scientific Community and most Science teachers all together. In 1997, The Times of London had an interview with Dr. Michael Richardson, an embryologist at St. George's Medical School in London. He stated, "This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. It's shocking to find that somebody once thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It makes me angry... What Haeckel did was to take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same at the same stage of development. They don't... These are fakes."

Yet... These fake drawings are appearing in many High School and College textbooks. Such as... "Evolutionary Biology, Third Edition" by Douglas J. Futuyma, Sinauer Associates... And... "Molecular Biology of the Cell, Third Edition" by Dr. Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences. The Science Community really needs to give up this pet theory... One must question how such scientists can continue to support evolution being taught as "fact," knowing that much of what we believe to be true today will have to be "self-corrected" in the future. Why not allow students to "examine the controversy" and discuss possible problems with evolutionary theory? How many students have accepted these fraud teachings as fact? Thousands!

Jeremiah 2:27 - "Saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth: for they have turned their back unto me, and not their face: but in the time of their trouble they will say, Arise, and save us."

Now... Let's move onto the "fossils" of our common ancestor... And allow me to elaborate what the Theory of Evolution is...

Came from rocks to this to that... So now there is a Common Ancestor between Apes and Humans, supposedly... So Scientists have tried to search out these fossils of the Common Ancestor, but have come out empty handed... To their dismay, they decided to create their own fossils to support the beloved theory...

Piltdown Man...

Piltdown Man was known as the discovery of the earliest Englishman. A laborer was supposedly digging in a gravel pit near the village of Piltdown in Sussex, southern England when he found a piece of bone. He passed it to the local archaeologist of the district, Charles Dawson, who verified its antiquity and pronounced that it was part of a skull which was possibly human. Dawson began to search for the rest of the skull.

In 1912, a jawbone was discovered. Sir Arthur Smith Woodward of the British Museum verified that the skull had human features and the jaw was ape-like. The fossils became known as Piltdown Man and were called Eoanthropus dawsoni which means, 'Dawson's Dawn Man'.

In 1915, another Dawn Man was found a couple of miles away from the site of the first find. Fossil remains of animals that lived with Piltdown Man, together with the tools that he used, were also found at the two sites. At last, here was "proof" that apes had evolved into humans in England. In 1953, Piltdown Man was exposed as a forgery, mainly through the work of Dr. Kenneth Oakley. He showed that the skull was from a modern human and that the jawbone and teeth were from an orangutan. The teeth had been filed down to make them look human. The bones and teeth had been chemically treated to give them the appearance of being ancient.

The desire to find the earliest Englishman had blinded the scientists of that day, so they uncritically accepted Piltdown Man as being legit. We cannot be a Scientific seeker of truth if we deny what the truth is and cling to some sort evolutionist parochial prejudice. We need to stay neutral... If Evolution is not 100% proven or any theory for that matter, including Intellectual Design... Then it need not to be taught as fact within our School System, but be presented as a possibility. Until we are 100% certain how the Earth was created, until that point we should only teach the theories, the possibilities. This includes teaching Evolution and Intellectual Design, along with any other theory and have an open-mind that thinks critically.

Nebraska Man...

This one is the funniest, saddest and most pathetic "proof" for the Common Ancestor... If you Google the drawing of Nebraska Man you will see what you imagine an ancient man to look like, but this drawing was made from looking at a single tooth. That is all it took for Evolutionists to come up with the drawing you will see. This, is obviously just active imagination because you cannot make such assumptions what a man looked like just by the look of his tooth. It is not fact, at all. And to their further embarrassment...

In 1922 Paleontologist Harald Cook found a single tooth in Western Nebraska, USA. Pliocene deposits that were alleged to be 6 Million Years Old. This Nebraska man's tooth was the reason that evolution started to be taught in schools. Before Nebraska man, evolution had a hard time getting taught in schools but, this success only lasted a few years before it was found out as a mistake... The tooth belonged to a thought-to-be extinct pig. A species of pig called "Prosthennops serus", this pig was found still alive in Paraguay in 1972.

Java Man...

In 1891 Java Man was found by Eugene Dubois who was the first person to deliberately search for human ancestors. Dubois was a former student of Ernst Haeckel who became intent on discovering the missing link that his mentor believed had evolved somewhere in Africa or East Asia, and which Haeckel had already named without any physical evidence – Pithecanthropus alalus or man without speech. Dubois signed up as a doctor with the Dutch medical corps in the Dutch East Indies with the intention of hunting for fossils during his spare time.

After years of excavations, they dug up a tooth and skullcap on the banks of the Solo River on Java island of Indonesia. The skullcap was ape-like having a low forehead and large eyebrow ridges. The following year, the workmen uncovered a thigh bone that was clearly human forty feet away from where the tooth was found. Due to the close proximity of the find, Dubois assumed they belonged to the same creature. Dubois then named the find, Pithecanthropus erectus or erect ape-man. Rudolph Virchow, who had been Haeckel's professor and is considered the father of modern Pathology remarked, "In my opinion this creature was an animal, a giant gibbon, in fact. The thigh bone has not the slightest connection with the skull."

And I would like to point out that just because the brow line is large, it only proves that this man was very old. As people in pre-flood times lived hundreds of years old and the brow line never stops growing.

Neanderthal Man...

After discovering the first Neanderthal skullcap in 1856 in the Neander Valley near Dusseldorf, Germany, German anatomist Ruldolph Virchow said in essence that the fossil was the remains of a modern man afflicted with rickets and osteoporosis. In 1958, at the International Congress of Zoology, A.J.E. Cave stated that his examination of the famous Neanderthal skeleton established that it was simply an old man who had suffered from arthritis.

Professor Reiner Protsch was invited to date the famous skull, which he later pronounced to be the vital missing link between Neanderthals and modern humans. He dated the skull at 36,000 years old, allowing it to fall neatly into the evolutionists' timeline between Neanderthals and modern man. Finally, thanks to Protsch, the gap had been filled. All the pieces were in place.

On February 18, 2005, Protsch was forced to retire in disgrace after a Frankfurt University panel ruled he had "fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues." — "Anthropologist Resigns in 'Dating Disaster,' 2005." Once believed to be a world-renowned expert on carbon dating, Protsch's entire professional career is now being questioned. The university noted, "The commission finds that Prof. Protsch has forged and manipulated scientific facts over the past 30 years." — "Anthropologist Resigns…" you can read this for yourself on World Net Daily. Other reads of interest are Luke Harding, 2005, "Another Day, Another 'Science' Fraud," MedKB. Apologetics Press... Articles/491 by Brad Harrub PH.D.

The Neanderthal skull was not the only forgery scientists at Oxford discovered. Protsch also had paraded "Binshof-Speyer" woman before the public, stating that she was 21,300 years old. Yet the new Oxford date puts this woman living at 1,300 B.C. Protsch also claimed that "Paderborn-Sande Man" walked the Earth 27,400 B.C., and yet the corrected figure reveals that he died only a couple hundred years ago in 1750.

Taung Child...

A fossil skull discovered by Raymond Dart in South Africa in 1924 was initially depicted as a supposed ancestor of man. However, contemporary evolutionists can no longer maintain that it represents such an ancestor—because it subsequently transpired that the skull belonged to a young gorilla! The famous anatomist Bernard Wood stated that this fossil constitutes no evidence in favor of evolution in an article published in New Scientist magazine.

Ocre Man...

On May 14, 1984, the Daily Telegraph, an Australian newspaper, carried the story of the latest hoax, "Ass Taken For Man!" was its witty headline.

A skull found in Spain and promoted as the oldest example of man in Eurasia. A 3 Day scientific symposium had been scheduled, so that the experts could examine and discuss the bone which had already been named, Orce Man, for the southern Spanish town near which it had been found. Scientists from Paris showed that Orce Man was a skull fragment of a four-month-old donkey. The embarrassed Spanish officials sent out 500 letters canceling the symposium.

Lucy...

Donald Johanson found Lucy at Dar Valley, Ethiopia in 1974; it was 40% of the skeleton, even though a depiction of her shows her complete body and the assumption of what she looked like. Very creatively designed sculptures of Lucy appear in tax-funded museums, and these sculptures are hoaxes, not following the obvious ape-like bone structures, but rather dishonestly presenting Lucy as if she had human-like bone structures. They show her arms and legs as looking human-like when no arm or leg bones were found.

Donald Johanson found her bones when his grant money was about to run out and the knee joint that he found a mile and a half away from the rest of the skeleton. Lucy was widely esteemed by evolutionists and was the subject of some of the most intensive speculation. However, it has been revealed that Lucy had an anatomy ideally suited to climbing trees and was no different from other apes we are familiar with. The French scientific journal Science et Vie covered the story in 1999 under the headline, "Adieu, Lucy."

In 2000, a study discovered a locking system in Lucy's forearms enabling it to walk using the knuckles, in the same way as modern-day chimps. In a recent study, Tel Aviv University anthropologists determined that Lucy's lower jaw bone is some kind of ape jaw bone. Other parts of the skeleton are just like the bones of knuckle-dragging, tree-climbing gorillas. Yet Lucy has been Evolutionism's poster child. I believe her to be an ancestor of the Orangutan due to her size and the anatomy of her bones. We can see from the original bones of Lucy that she was a knuckle walker and a tree dweller. Frank Brown, a evolutionist and geologist of the University of Utah said this, "We've always assumed Lucy was our ancestor, and now we need to re-evaluate that idea,"

If you believe in Evolution that is your choice, but don't pass it off as fact when it is no more than a belief that relies on faith. If you wish to prove your belief, do it with truth and not lies. If you are unsure, say you are unsure... We need more humble people in this world, not more arrogant ones.

There's many more frauds within mainline Science Textbooks... Another fossil fraud known as Archaeoraptor, and frauds such as Horse Evolution Fraud, Peppered Moth and the Age of the Earth. Dating the fossils by the rocks and the rocks by the fossils... It's circular reasoning! And that's just not Scientific... I don't have time to debunk every single fraud, and you my readers would get tired of reading down such a long list, but if you'd like to present me with a certain fossil or scientific principle I would be happy to answer, for now... Let's move on to debunk...

Natural Selection...

Natural selection is the gradual process by which biological traits become either more or less common in a population as a function of the effect of inherited traits on the differential reproductive success of organisms interacting with their environment.

Natural selection is an observable process that falls into the category of operational science. This is Scientific. We have observed mosquitoes, birds, and many microorganisms and many species undergoing change in relatively short periods of time. New species have been observed to arise. This is completely undeniable, it is Scientific, it has been observed. Where this idea that Natural Selection leads to molecules-to-man evolution... Is where the theory goes wrong. This is the belief that one kind of animal turns into another kind of animal. Speciation. Lions, (Panthera leo) and Tigers (Panthera tigris) are both members of the cat kind, but they are considered different species primarily due to their geographic isolation. However, it is possible to mate the two. Ligers (male lion and female tiger) and tigons (male tigers and female lions) are produced. These two species came from the original cat kind that would have been present on Noah's Ark. The same things goes for any kind; a wolf and chihuahua are part of the same dog kind. An eagle and a pigeon are apart of the same bird kind.

A Lion and a Tiger certainly had a common ancestor with more genetic variety. As the two populations became separated, certain genes were lost and two new species eventually formed. The formation of new species as a result of loss of information is the opposite type of change required to demonstrate molecules-to-man evolution. This, and other examples found in the textbooks, confirms the biblical creationist model of variation within a kind is scientific.

Evolutionary biologists assume, based on geologic interpretations that are wrong, that there have been billions of years for this process to occur. If the Earth is thousands of years old instead of billions, the hypothesis falls apart.

The other requirement, a mechanism for change, is also assumed to exist—even though it has never been observed. We mentioned earlier that natural selection tends to delete information from the population. If natural selection is the mechanism that explains the successive adaptations, it must provide new genetic information. To produce the new bones in the fins requires an elaborate orchestration of biologic processes. The bones don't just have to be present; they must develop at the right time in the embryo, have their shape and size predetermined by the DNA sequence, be attached to the correct tendons, ligaments, and blood vessels, attach to the bones of the pectoral girdle, and so on. The amount of information required for this seemingly simple transformation cannot be provided by a process that generally deletes information from the genome. A female while in her mother's womb already has all of her eggs while she is a fetus... So how can women be involved in such a drastic evolution... We cannot.

Let's compare the varies different dog breeds, the Canis lupus familiaris. Darwin thought they might come from multiple sources, including the wolf, jackal and coyote, thereby in part explaining their diversity. The DNA evidence, however, shows that they are all derived from the wolf. DNA from all dogs is over 99% identical to that of a wolf, while the wolf and coyote DNAs, for example, are over 4% different from each other. This means, surprisingly, that all of the diversity of dog types in the world today came from a single source, the wolf... But a house cat hasn't come out of a wolf, a fish or bird hasn't come out of a wolf. And if ever certain breeders stop breeding a certain time of dog, the chihuahua for example (since they seem pretty useless... Kidding.) If you slowly stop breeding the chihuahua the breed would slowly become extinct, but the other breeds that chihuahua's helped create would remain, characteristics, information of this breed. We're all mutts, so it seems. Observational science supports this type of subtle change within a kind but not molecules-to-man evolution... Not monkey to man...

We have observed the change in dogs over time, many different breeds within the kind. You can breed wolves to get to chihuahuas, but you can't breed chihuahuas to get wolves, variation in the genetic information has been lost. Darwin used this type of change as evidence without an understanding of the limits of genetic change that are known today. So you can breed wolves to get a chihuahua, but you cannot get that chihuahua to become a cat or human or any separate species as Evolution Theory states. This type of evolution from one kind of animal into another animal has not been observed and is not Scientific. There is only changes in the kind, not changes into another kind.

Let's look at birds since Darwin used finches to prove his Evolution Theory... Birds spread out into the lush new world growing in the newly deposited soil, they produce offspring of woodpecker that contain both long-beak and short-beak genes. Areas populated by trees with thick, soft bark would tend to select for birds with longer beaks. Areas where the bark was thinner and harder would tend to be populated by woodpeckers with shorter beaks. The long-beaked woodpeckers would still have the ability to produce short-beaked offspring, but they would be less able to compete, and those genes would tend to decrease in frequency in the population, no to very little short-beak woodpecker. Due to their isolation, two new species of woodpecker would develop, but within their kind. This is Natural Selection! But to say this bird will evolve into a human is absurd. And speaking of woodpeckers... Animals that prove Intellectual Design...

Woodpecker...

The woodpecker catches its food with its tongue which has barbs and a bit of glue on the end, this glue doesn't make their beak stick together either but their saliva allows them to eat the bug that they can pick up hiding in their little tunnels inside a tree. The tongue circles around behind the head and neck under the loose skin gives the tongue enough extra length so it can shoot out about six inches into the burrow inside a tree trunk.

Their tongue is long, but instead of dangling down and getting tangled around branches when it flies, the slack is kept under the loose skin behind its neck. Back there, the tiny bones divide into essentially two tongues, coming back together before entering the beak. Not to mention the sponge behind their beak that protects their brain when they are banging their head against the tree. Their glue mechanism, their saliva, their long tongue and their sponge in their brain protecting them from head trauma are all unique attributes to this bird.

Bombardier Beetle...

This creature, in its body has two sacks of chemicals that explode when added together, but are benign when kept separately. Thus, the first capability is that this beetle has two separate sacks that keep the chemicals separate until the beetle needs the chemical to protect itself. The second capability is that the beetle has an asbestos type lining in his "firebox" in which the chemicals are added. This "firebox" lining keeps the chemical explosion from destroying the body of the beetle when it explodes outward.

However, a third capability is needed to keep the explosion that occurs right outside the body of the beetle from blowing the beetle away when the stream of explosive chemical erupts out of the body. If the stream were continuous, the beetle would be blown away from the chemical coming out its body; however, the beetle pulsates his stream in tiny, continuous droplet pulsation. Thus, the stream of explosive material is not continuous, so the beetle is not killed by his own protective mechanism! Three very complicated, but cooperating capabilities had to come together at once in this beetle, no evidence of it evolving from another creature, truly unique and designed the way it is now. Thus, the Bombardier Beetle by itself utterly disproves Evolution.

Giraffe...

Because the neck of the Giraffe extends so high into the air, the heart must contain an extraordinarily strong pump to force the blood from the lower body to the highest reaches of the brain. Thus, the first capability unique to the giraffe is a heart that is also a most powerful pump. However, when the giraffe lowers its neck to drink, the blood that is circulating in its neck will suddenly come rushing down by the force of gravity. This sudden rush of blood is so strong, it would quickly cause the giraffe to suffer a brain aneurysm, killing the animal instantly. Therefore, the second capability is that spigots are built into his neck arteries that instantly close down whenever the animal lowers its neck to drink water.

However, when the giraffe abruptly raises its head after drinking, the blood would flow so rapidly downward through the force of gravity that the animal would suffer a sudden loss of blood to the brain, thus causing him to pass out cold. However, God has built a third capability that prevents this from occurring. The brain has a sponge-like material just behind the brain that has gradually been absorbing blood all the time the giraffe has been drinking. When the giraffe suddenly raises his head, that blood very slowly drains out of the brain, thus keeping the giraffe from passing out, while the spigots open up and the blood begins to flow naturally.

Three very complicated, but cooperating capabilities had to come together at once in the giraffe. If you take any of these capabilities away, the animal dies. If any one of these capabilities arrived on the scene later than the others, the animals would die. Dead animals do not evolve. Even the most ardent Evolutionist has no answer as to how these individual animals could possess two or three independent capabilities that uniquely work together, and must have been present in the animal at a single moment of time... In the beginning... Genesis 1.

Australian Incubator Bird...

The Megapode or "incubator bird" is unique among birds. All birds use body heat to incubate their eggs except the incubator bird. So, if they evolved, from what did they evolve?

The female is responsible for two activities. First, she must test the nest to be sure it is adequate for incubating her eggs. A nest that is dug by the male bird and must be dug 3 feet into the ground and extend 10 or more feet above ground and up to 50 feet across. And what would motivate a little 4 pound male bird to get busy constructing this monstrous nest number two, should the hen reject the father's first effort? After accepting the nest, the mother lays 20 to 35 eggs at the rate of one egg every 3 Days for up to 7 Months. Each egg weighs about a half a pound and is as large as an ostrich egg. That is a tremendous amount of work for a 3 pound hen. No wonder that upon completion of her laying task, she leaves the nest, never to return. She takes no part in the incubation and raising of her chicks.

At this point the father begins to perform his job of managing the incubation of the deeply buried eggs. For incubator bird chicks to survive they demand a precise temperature of 91°F. Yes, exactly 91°F. If the male bird wants the chicks to survive, he will not let the temperature vary more then one degree on either side of 91°F! Very impressive bird... Talk about a deadbeat dad? I think not!

The Chicken Egg...

The shell itself is highly specialized. Each egg has a shell made from mainly calcium form around the egg, fertilized or not. Each chicken egg shell has about 10,000 tiny pores. You can prove this in a little home-school science lesson... Put a raw egg in warm water and soon you will see tiny bubbles floating up. These bubbles are escaping through the pores in the shell. The developing chick needs these pores to breathe. Evolution basically says that when a need arises in an organism, mindless, random chance processes provide exactly, precisely and specifically what the organism needs to alter and improve it so that it will survive. The chick does not know it needs the holes in the shell to breathe until it dies for lack of air. Of course, dead chicks cannot evolve, and how can a chick be aware of this in the first place when fetuses are considered not conscious in this day and age thanks to the Pro-Choice Movement?

Within the first few days after the egg is laid, blood vessels begin to grow out of the developing chick. Two of these attach to the membrane under the egg shell and two attach to the yolk. By the fifth day, the tiny heart is pumping blood through the vessels. The chick feeds from the yolk with the yolk vessels and breathes through the membrane vessels. If any of these vessels do not grow out of the chick or attach to the correct place, the chick will die. The chick gives off carbon dioxide and water vapor as it metabolizes the yolk. If it does not get rid of the carbon dioxide and water vapor, it will die of gaseous poisoning or drown in its own waste. These waste products are picked up by the blood vessels and leave through the pores in the eggshell.

By the nineteenth day, the chick is too big to get enough oxygen through the pores in the shell. By this time, a small tooth called the "egg-tooth" has grown on its beak. It uses this little tooth to peck a hole into the air sack at the flat end of the egg. When you peel a hard-boiled egg you notice the thin membrane under the shell and the flattened end of the egg. This flattened end, which looks like the hen did not quite fill up her egg shell, is the air sack. The air sack provides only six hours of air for the chick to breathe. Instead of relaxing and breathing deeply, with this new-found supply of air, the chick keeps pecking... The twentieth day the chick breaks out into the world.

Platypus...

The bill of the platypus is like a duck's bill. On each foot there are not only five toes, but webbing which makes it a cross between a duck and an animal which has to scratch and dig. Unlike most mammals, the limbs of the platypus are short and parallel to the ground. The external ear is only a hole without the ear lobe which mammals usually have. The eyes are small. The platypus is nocturnal. It catches its food under water and stores the worms, snails, grubs, etc, in cheek pouches like those of a rodent.

Platypus fossils are exactly the same as modern forms. The complex structures of the egg and milk glands are always fully developed and offer no solution as to the origin and development of the womb or the milk. The more typical mammals are found in much lower strata that the egg-laying platypus. Thus, the duck-billed platypus appears to be a distinct kind of animal in of itself that has been specifically designed to include a mixture of traits.

Black and Yellow Garden Spider... I have these at my home in N.C. and as much as I love them for defying evolution... They creep me out, look so gross. They defy evolution mainly by their webs and their way of travel, other animals that defy evolution are Gecko and Chuckwalla Lizards, Human Eye and Ear Drums, Lampsylis Mussel, Horses, Ostriches, Hummingbirds, Manatees, Penguins and many more of God's creatures. There is a good series called, The Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution by former evolutionist, Dr. Joe Martin. I recommend it. Even the lower human rib bone is the only bone that will grow back, Adam's rib bone is the one God took to make Eve and women have one more pair of ribs then men. It all lines up with Scripture... There could only be the explanation of an Intellectual Designer... Our God, our Creator, Lord Jesus Christ our Savior.

CONCLUSION…

There are many misunderstandings about God... Don't let misunderstandings, mistranslation, the school system, the organized church system and other unrighteous Christians form your opinion about Christ Himself. He and His word is good. Don't allow lack of knowledge or willful ignorance get in the way of a relationship with your Creator Jesus Christ...

Psalm 14:1 - "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good."

Mark 16:16 - "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."